Behind the numbers: Q4 GDP
Gross domestic product undershot expectations last quarter, but the shortfall appears driven more by the temporary government shutdown than broad-based weakness. Consumer demand remains resilient, and with supportive fiscal policy, easing financial conditions and a steady labor market, the outlook points to a modest acceleration in economic activity this year.
Last week’s fourth quarter gross domestic product (GDP) report came in at annualized pace of 1.4%, disappointing many Wall Street analysts who had anticipated 2.8%. For some investors, the news renewed concerns about an economic slowdown.
Growth was indeed softer than the 3% or more recorded in the previous two quarters, but the drivers of the miss are clear. The biggest drag was government spending at −0.9%, an unusually weak contribution that suggests the fourth quarter could have ended near 2.3% — above trend — absent the 43‑day government shutdown.
Consumption, the largest driver of GDP with a 70% share, slowed slightly to 1.6%, yet it remains resilient and in line with the average since 2024. We believe fiscal stimulus, lower interest rates and a steady job market will support household balance sheets and spending going forward.
Taken together, the evidence suggests the government shutdown — rather than a broad slowdown — drove the shortfall. Consensus GDP is 2.5% this year, and our target of 2.3% closely matches, reflecting our confidence in the economy amid a steady job market and sustained consumer spending.
891108 Exp : 24 February 2027
YOU MIGHT ALSO LIKE
Higher inflation and elevated interest rates typically weigh on corporate profitability, yet corporate margins continue to climb to record highs. While that strength is evident both in the U.S. and abroad, U.S. outperformance versus Europe is now the widest on record. Stronger margins have helped contribute to better-than-expected earnings and reinforce U.S. equity leadership. The question now is whether that strength can persist?
Higher interest rates have become a frequently cited risk to corporate earnings and the economy. The conventional thinking is straightforward: when borrowing costs rise, companies face higher interest expenses, profits come under pressure, and economic growth slows. While there is truth to that relationship, the current cycle may differ from investors’ expectations.
Both the dot-com era and the rise of artificial intelligence suggest that early productivity data can understate the actual economic impact of transformative technologies. In the case of the internet, later revisions to productivity gains surpassed early estimates. The same may prove true for AI, implying stronger support for growth.
History of stocks after the Fed hikes
History of stocks after the fed hikes
Sticky inflation and resilient growth have revived monetary tightening, increasing the risk of higher-for-longer rates and near-term volatility. We continue to believe economic resilience and strong corporate profits should continue to provide a favorable backdrop for stocks, and would use periods of market weakness to add selectively to equities. Additionally, owning real assets can help hedge against inflation.




