Please ensure Javascript is enabled for purposes of website accessibility Markets Since Iran Conflict
be
en
institutional
institutional
false
true
Gathering data
Disclaimer Not Available

Markets since Iran conflict

cotw-30-03-2026-thumbnail-580x326px

Markets are reacting to the Middle East conflict with sharp moves across asset classes, signaling broad risk repricing and shifting safe‑haven behavior. While volatility is elevated, fundamentals like earnings growth continue to support our constructive outlook. 


The conflict in the Middle East is evolving rapidly, and the market impact spans key asset classes and indices. Oil prices have appreciated roughly 50%, U.S. equities are 7-10% lower and U.S. Treasury yields are about 50 basis points higher, suggesting investors are not seeking safety there. Additionally, Treasury yields have reached their highest levels in almost a year due to the concern surrounding persistent inflation. Gold — traditionally a safe haven and inflation hedge — is down 15%. However, the U.S. dollar is 2.6% stronger. These moves reflect a broad risk repricing and shifting safe-haven dynamics.

Volatility has risen meaningfully and is likely to remain elevated until there is a clear path to resolution. The CBOE Volatility Index, the primary fear gauge of the market, has exceeded 30 for the first time since April 2, 2025, when investors digested the implications of “Liberation Day.” As long as conditions in the Middle East remain unstable and negotiations continue, we expect volatility to persist; following a resolution, we anticipate a gradual normalization.

Even so, our outlook remains constructive. S&P 500 price-to-earnings ratios have compressed to 19 times with earnings growth estimates for 2026 still above 15%High yield bonds, typically viewed as relatively risky, are down only 2%. International equities, which were outperforming before the war began, have sold off more than the U.S. and are now in a correction.

Despite reduced risk tolerance, current signals point to a temporary disruption in oil prices, near-term pressure on inflation and uneven economic activity rather than the onset of a recession. The longer the conflict persists and oil prices remain elevated, the greater the potential impact; however, historically, markets have priced out oil shocks and geopolitical events over time. We anticipate U.S. growth of roughly 2% this year, and our guidance to clients is to stay the course as volatility often creates buying opportunities for long-term investors.

RELATED CONTENT
Higher yields, but lower sensitivity
Chart of the Week | Macroeconomic

Higher interest rates have become a frequently cited risk to corporate earnings and the economy. The conventional thinking is straightforward: when borrowing costs rise, companies face higher interest expenses, profits come under pressure, and economic growth slows. While there is truth to that relationship, the current cycle may differ from investors’ expectations.

Is AI productivity hiding in the data?
Chart of the Week | Macroeconomic

Both the dot-com era and the rise of artificial intelligence suggest that early productivity data can understate the actual economic impact of transformative technologies. In the case of the internet, later revisions to productivity gains surpassed early estimates. The same may prove true for AI, implying stronger support for growth.

History of stocks after the fed hikes
Chart of the Week | Macroeconomic

Sticky inflation and resilient growth have revived monetary tightening, increasing the risk of higher-for-longer rates and near-term volatility. We continue to believe economic resilience and strong corporate profits should continue to provide a favorable backdrop for stocks, and would use periods of market weakness to add selectively to equities. Additionally, owning real assets can help hedge against inflation.

Inflation is a global problem
Chart of the Week | Macroeconomic

Resilient economic growth, sticky inflation driven by higher energy prices and continued geopolitical uncertainty are complicating the path back to central-bank price targets. We believe policymakers are likely to adopt a tightening bias but remain data dependent.

Gathering data
Disclaimer Not Available

This is a marketing communication