Please ensure Javascript is enabled for purposes of website accessibility Fed thoughts: Climbing up the learning curve
uk
en
institutional
institutional
false
true
Gathering data
Disclaimer Not Available

Fed thoughts: Climbing up the learning curve

Fed thoughts: Climbing up the learning curve

Change can be difficult to navigate, especially when its principal agent explicitly rejects prevailing norms. Less than five months into the job, Federal Reserve (the Fed) Chair Kevin Warsh has put investors in that position, which makes charting the course of monetary policy complicated.


However, there are a few things we’re reasonably sure of:

  • The Fed will likely raise rates at least one more time this year.
  • The Fed will likely not signal its decision going into the October meeting, as Warsh tends to avoid forward guidance to keep the “family discussion” lively.
  • The Fed will likely present a firm stance in pursuit of price stability, imparting a hawkish skew to its message. 
     


We are uncertain about the cadence of policy action. The group leans toward removing accommodation, but its leader, who proposed cutting the annual number of scheduled meetings, may prefer less frequent interventions. We believe these stylistic changes reflect a different worldview from his immediate predecessors. Warsh places greater faith in market mechanisms, and he would rather learn from investors than lead them, worries less about high-frequency fluctuations in the data, and may prefer less frequent intervention.

We examine these issues one at a time.

Going With the Flow

The chair has been clear: “Forward guidance is not the business we should be in.”1 This has been widely interpreted as learning from investors, but we think of it as working with markets in a manner best seen from first principles.

Most modern models of policy setting describe policy as attempting to improve social welfare. Given the Fed’s dual objective, this is accomplished by keeping employment at its maximum sustainable level and inflation at the goal of 2 percent. With the labor market now roughly in balance, that calculation depends on inflation’s proximity to goal. The further away inflation is from goal, the greater the loss to society. Moreover, the loss to society increases rapidly away from 2 percent.

  • When inflation is far from goal, the appropriate policy direction is clearer: policy tends to be easy when inflation is well below goal and tight when it is well above goal. Market participants can help the Fed by keeping inflation expectations well anchored, which the Fed encourages through forward guidance about its policy determination.
  • When inflation is near goal, the policy tradeoff is more delicate. The correct direction depends on an uncertain outlook. Market participants can help the Fed by expressing their own view on the appropriate stance of policy. For a clean read on that opinion, however, the Fed shouldn’t put its weight on the scale and should refrain from forward guidance.

We are relatively sure that Warsh currently sees the world as in the latter, flatter part of the policy terrain, where listening to markets makes more sense than leading them. Some of his colleagues probably view that area as more circumscribed, as witnessed by the sharing of their policy views in public. But those are their own views, as Warsh is not likely to send others in his stead to shape the message to markets given his sense of the Fed’s appropriate place in the policy space, in my view.

Newton’s First Law

It appears that Warsh’s preference to learn from markets rather than influence them also leads him to worry less about the fluctuations of high-frequency data. His short summary from the September press conference was: “Trends matter. Data points are noisy. Data dependence is a dangerous preoccupation.”2 However, even though he wants to dial back data dependence, he also seems comfortable with gradual 25-basis-point policy adjustments.

An eighteen-month economic outlook is unlikely to change in the six weeks between FOMC meetings, and a change significant enough to alter the policy direction is also unlikely to call for just one 25-basis-point adjustment. Once such an adjustment begins, momentum takes over. The result is Newtonian, as the first law of physics states that a body at rest stays at rest, and a body in motion stays in motion (unless acted upon by an outside force), which is why we believe that the Fed is likely to raise rates further this year. The inertial body is in motion.

Setting the Pace of Action

We are less certain of how Warsh’s medium-termism (a view of market conditions over the medium term — from the next several quarters to a couple of years) translates into the timing of decisions. He has asked the Committee to consider fewer regularly scheduled meetings. That would not necessarily mean fewer policy actions, but it would raise the institutional hurdle for frequent adjustments. As he said at his confirmation hearings, “Four is not enough,” but it seems that eight may be too many.3

Forgoing action in October wouldn’t halt the Fed’s forward motion (as we expect the messaging to be forceful about returning inflation to goal), only establish its pace. At the very least, Warsh will likely head into the meeting with no firm plan to raise rates, although the “family discussion” at the meeting could tip the scales the other way. We’re inclined to put the chances of action higher than currently in markets because action may help satisfy Warsh’s desire to be an agent of change:

  • Rate-increase policy reinforces his commitment to recover price stability;
  • Unexpected action demonstrates that all meetings are live; and
  • Delivers another blow to forward guidance from Fed officials.

We believe that medium-termism can win out and that action will likely be deferred to December, but we can’t say for certain (and neither should you).


1FederalReserve.gov, Transcript of Chairman Warsh’s Press Conference, June 17, 2026.

2 FederalReserve.gov, September 15–16, 2026 FOMC Meeting, September 16, 2026.

3 rev.com, Warsh Confirmation Hearing, April 22, 2026. 


Important Information

BNY Investments is the brand name for the investment management business of BNY and its investment firm affiliates worldwide. BNY is the corporate brand of The Bank of New York Mellon Corporation and may be used to reference the corporation as a whole or its various subsidiaries generally.

The information contained herein reflects general views and is provided for informational purposes only. This material is not intended as investment advice nor is it a recommendation to adopt any investment strategy.

Opinions and views expressed are subject to change without notice.

Past performance is no guarantee of future results.

Issuing Entities

This material is only for distribution in those countries and to those recipients listed, subject to the noted conditions and limitations: • United States: by BNY Mellon Securities Corporation (BNYSC), 240 Greenwich Street, New York, NY 10286. BNYSC, a registered broker-dealer and FINRA member, has entered into agreements to offer securities in the U.S. on behalf of certain BNY Investments firms. • Europe (excluding Switzerland): BNY Mellon Fund Management (Luxembourg) S.A., 2-4 Rue EugèneRuppertL-2453 Luxembourg. • UK, Africa and Latin America (ex-Brazil): BNY Mellon Investment Management EMEA Limited, BNY Mellon Centre, 160 Queen Victoria Street, London EC4V 4LA. Registered in England No. 1118580. Authorised and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority. • South Africa: BNY Mellon Investment Management EMEA Limited is an authorised financial services provider. • Switzerland: BNY Mellon Investments Switzerland GmbH, Bärengasse 29, CH-8001 Zürich, Switzerland. • Middle East: DIFC branch of The Bank of New York Mellon. Regulated by the Dubai Financial Services Authority. • South East Asia and South Asia: BNY Mellon Investment Management Singapore Pte. Limited Co. Reg. 201230427E. Regulated by the Monetary Authority of Singapore. • Hong Kong: BNY Mellon Investment Management Hong Kong Limited. Regulated by the Hong Kong Securities and Futures Commission. • Japan: BNY Mellon Investment Management Japan Limited. BNY Mellon Investment Management Japan Limited is a Financial Instruments Business Operator with license no 406 (Kinsho) at the Commissioner of Kanto Local Finance Bureau and is a Member of the Investment Trusts Association, Japan and Japan Investment Advisers Association and Type II Financial Instruments Firms Association. • Brazil: ARX Investimentos Ltda., Av. Borges de Medeiros, 633, 4th floor, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil, CEP 22430-041. Authorized and regulated by the Brazilian Securities and Exchange Commission (CVM). • Canada: BNY Mellon Asset Management Canada Ltd. is registered in all provinces and territories of Canada as a Portfolio Manager and Exempt Market Dealer, and as a Commodity Trading Manager in Ontario. All issuing entities are subsidiaries of The Bank of New York Mellon Corporation.

No part of this material may be reproduced in any form, or referred to in any other publication, without express written permission. All information contained herein is proprietary and is protected under copyright law.

NOT FDIC INSURED | NO BANK GUARANTEE | MAY LOSE VALUE

© 2026 THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON CORPORATION

MARK-1018555-2026-10-14


GU-963-14 October 2027

RELATED CONTENT
Can the bull run in corporate margins continue?
Chart of the Week | Macroeconomic

Higher inflation and elevated interest rates typically weigh on corporate profitability, yet corporate margins continue to climb to record highs. While that strength is evident both in the U.S. and abroad, U.S. outperformance versus Europe is now the widest on record. Stronger margins have helped contribute to better-than-expected earnings and reinforce U.S. equity leadership. The question now is whether that strength can persist?

What does resilience look like today?
Article | Fixed Income

Today’s fixed income world rewards investment managers who are willing to accommodate changes in the market backdrop and outlook in real time.

The strategic advantage: building resilience with active fixed income
Article | Fixed Income

Higher inflation, rising interest rates and greater uncertainty have made investing more challenging. For bond investors, simply owning bonds may no longer be enough to successfully diversify risk.

Seeking out AI’s next winners
Article | Equities

Artificial intelligence (AI) is driving one of the largest investment cycles in decades. The companies building the infrastructure that underpins AI – from semiconductors and manufacturing equipment to cloud platforms and data centers – are attracting significant attention as organizations invest heavily to develop and deploy the technology.

Gathering data
Disclaimer Not Available

This is a marketing communication